What if? A new way to think about PD and conferences.

Practical Part 2
I just spent a delightful (but tiring!) weekend at the Korea TESOL conference in Seoul. Met so many teachers that I only knew online – it was truly overwhelming. A special thanks to all those who took in my presentations and/or helped with getting the news out about EnglishCentral. You are all essential components in this push to transform the way students learn English.

But I’m not writing a self congratulatory piece. What I’d like to reflect upon is a thought that came over me as I was giving my talk about “The Flipped Classroom”.

My presentation was well attended and I think I accomplished my goal – to provoke a new way of thinking about how we deliver our curriculum / classes. That said, as I was going through my slides and outlining the what/how/why of the Flipped Classroom, I kept having a strange feeling come over me. I wanted to “STOP” and get off this train, stop and just talk with everyone. Discuss, relate, bob and weave. Flow.  Why should I have a goal, a method beyond us being / sharing / learning together?

You see, presentations and workshops as we know them are fake. Contrived performances.  We all agree not to see the pink elephant in the room. You can call this beast many things; power, protocol, role playing, “going through the motions” etc… but it all boils down to most presentations being an event with a social veneer – a veneer that says, “I agree to listen and do what you want – you agree to play the authority and all knowing”. Then, the next one and so on….

Again, I say this is a crock and we should be doing more to make it so that each person in the room finds relevance, gets connected, is energized. But how to do this without the conventions of “the presentation”? How to deal with the pink elephant in the room, an elephant that I think was laughing at me while I was presenting?

What if we had presentations without a set topic? Where people show up without an organized agenda. Where the discussion goes this way and that way – as the experience and knowledge of those in the room dictate and NOT as the set delivery of the typical presentation would dictate.

I would love just to go to a conference as David Deubelbeiss. No topic, no agenda (or as Van Morrison might have said, “no teacher, no guru, no method”). Just come and let me share my knowledge, scatter my filing cabinet onto the floor for all to see. Teachers could come and get what they want – not what the presentation dictated they must learn. The discussion could range from where to download great video content to the role of grammar in direct instruction. It could have stories or hard data. It could roam into applied linguistics or talk about making our students happy in the classroom. They key is – no set agenda/course. The focus is on the art of the presenter to direct the winds that arrive from those in the room. To guide the ship and bravely sail into “knowing”.

What if ……

The #1 …. (quality of a successful student)

Number One** Not your ordinary, endless list – just what’s number 1.

Grit / Perseverence

I asked my B.Ed. students this question recently – the number 1 quality that research shows will lead to a “successful” student. They came up with many great qualities but didn’t hit the nail on the head –  probably (and admirably) because they were focused less on student achievement and more on student personal growth.

But when using student achievement as the measuring stick – “grit” stands out. The quality to keep going, to endure, to not give up when obstacles appear and get in the way.  It is based on the work of Angela Duckworth .  A lot of research showed self control as being the most important quality for student achievement and long term success at school. We all remember the famous Stanford “marshmallow experiment”, I’m sure.  Students who could postpone short term gratification for long term pay off – excelled at school (see Larry Ferlazzo’s great list of resources on this topic). However, Duckworth went further, studying these successful students. She found that many did not end up succeeding later on. Yet, those with “grit” did achieve long term success. She devized a simple scale to determine if a student might have “grit” – what it takes to carry on.

You can take/see the short version of her quiz HERE. 


 

I find this fascinating. Looking at my own  students, the ones that I thought would succeed later in life, I see this so well.  It begs the question if we can “teach” grit,  help students develop this quality early on in life.

I think we can (but the question of “do we want to? is debatable).  Especially for language learners, we should expose them early on to lots of ambiguity, so they learn to tolerate the fact they can’t understand everything and will be in a state of frustration and may I say “pain”.  And if we can do this early enough – expose students to initial hurdles that we can help walk them through, hand in hand, in a safe environment – we will promote and help instill the quality of “grit”.

As Angela Duckworth so well addresses – measuring achievement by “intelligence”, isn’t a right measure. Also, “success” isn’t latent, it isn’t just talent that rises to the top. It is “industry” or “work”. It was my badge of honor as a runner – no talent but just would work and never give up. This quality we MUST develop in language learners. If you have any ideas on how to do this – please comment.

Here she outlines here ideas about “True Grit”, in fine style.

If you liked this, you may enjoy: Having Teaching Endurance and Keeping Going

Free “Won’t”

I’ve been thinking a lot about “free will” and the nature of the choices we make – both in teaching and in life.

Recent research, especially since the famous Libert experiment, suggests we make decisions before we even know we make decisions. Meaning, something, a “ghost inside the machine” is controlling us and that free will according to most neuroscientists, is an illusion.

Big claims. Big ideas. And what does this have to do with teaching?

Teaching is very transactional in nature. We make thousands of decisions during the teaching day. This is the “art” of teaching. Some studies suggest we make on average over 3,000 decisions / day – that’s around 7 or so a minute. Up there with stressful jobs like air traffic controllers and athletes on the field. Teachers are “decision beasts”. But what does this research saying to us, your decisions don’t matter, they are all preordained, what does this research mean to a teacher or student?

I think it points to the fact that freedom, free will, is by nature, “negative”. We humans make decisions based on “no” and not “yes”. Oscar Wilde’s famous dictum that, “The true freedom of man rests in the capacity to say no”, rings true.

I remember reading Isiah Berlin, a very underrated philosopher who pointed towards this same kind of negative freedom of will as being primary. (his “The Power of Ideas” is well worth reading). Our freedom is realized through interventions – that we “not” do certain things. This fits well into what a teacher does. They don’t so much make choices as negate certain choices from occurring. They break into the normal routine and outrolling of human social behavior and push it in new directions. Teachers don’t control the water in the river, they can’t decrease this water’s flow. However, they can throw things into the river and effect its direction, speed, course…..

I see the same sort of thing happening in the language student. The student takes in so much input but won’t make progress unless this input is “negated”, unless the student says, “No” to this language form/item. This partners well with the notion that language awareness, “noticing”, is so powerful and not until then, does a student learn from language input. You can spend years in a room listening to seemingly meaningless sounds and babble. But once you have a piece of the puzzle, some foothold of meaning, you can say “No” to the flow of language and begin to direct its course and find the true “flow” and “path” that is fluency.  This is why I’m a big believer in the power of instant feedback through invasive technology – something EnglishCentral does well. Giving the learner an instant comparison of their language pronunciation and form against a model. Based on this, they can express their “Free Won’t” – saying in effect, “I won’t make that mistake again!”.  Noticing.

If this all seems abstract and rambling, it is! I’m jet lagged and using my blog as a sounding board and reflective source of knowing. In any case, it is something to think about – that learning is not saying “yes” to information but rather the ability to discriminate discrete units of information and realize our freedom through the fundamental power of “Free Won’t”.

If you liked this post, you may enjoy “The four keys to language learning: Input, Input, Input, Noticing.”

Basic TEFL Certificate Course

We now have 12 graduates!  See what the certificate you get after graduation looks like, below.

Here is a chart outlining where students are so far in the course. Inspiring and teachers ARE slowing down and taking the course more seriously now. Great news!  (read my previous post about this and why I stopped it being “free”).

I will be looking at ways to make this widely available. Groups can contact me for a discount code that will significantly decrease the cost/student. It is a great review of TEFL and perfect for a basic foundations brush up for TEFL training.  Check out the course HERE. Sign in with id/pw:  demo / demo12

I’m also busy making a final exam for this. This too will help make the course more “valid” and it will consist of 20 questions that you must get 80% on to exit the course and graduate.

Reality check – TEFL Certificate Course


I will also add to this, “Give a man a fish and he’ll just expect to not work for any more. Make him pay a little and he’ll value that fish and his work to purchase it”.

I’m saying this as background to some reflection I’ve been doing based on the recent FREE TEFL Certificate course I launched.

It has always been my goal to provide free or low cost assess to knowledge and materials for teachers. I’ve worked night and day, year in and year out,  to counter so much of the blatant commercialism that pervades TEFL. Worked tirelessly to “fight the good fight” and use the possibilities of new technologies to the utmost benefit of hard working and low paid teachers. Sharing, community, can empower us.

However, both on my community EFL Classroom 2.0 and especially with the launch of the new TEFL Certificate course, I’ve learned an important lesson. If teachers get it for free, some really don’t value what they get. Not everyone but my guess is a good majority. Not blaming or accusing any one person – it is just human nature.

I won’t go into all the emails of support and so positive in nature. I also won’t go into how many emails I got from so many who seemed “entitled” and being very aggressive about why “this wasn’t there” or “there was a dead link, quit wasting my time”. Not going there. Want to relate something else.

With the Free TEFL Course, I was gladly going to pay the cost/ student that is incurred. My paying it forward for education. However, never thought so many would take advantage of this (I expected 20-30/month – we now have over 300 and close to 200 students taking the course right now). But most importantly, never thought so many would just NOT watch the videos, think about the ideas but rather whiz through the quizzes, just trying to complete them and get the certificate.

The nice thing about the school’s LMS is that I see everything. Loads of student data. I can tell how long a teacher stayed on a page, interacted with the content. How many times they took a quiz, the results etc… To my amazement, over 70% of teachers were just clicking the quizzes and trying to run through the lessons like it was some video game.

Example: A great student.

Example: A “quick” student.

So, I tried limiting the attempts. Also, monitoring the time on task. However, still teachers are taking very little time watching videos and reflecting/interacting with the ideas in the PDFs. And there isn’t a lot I can do.

So I’m now going to make teachers pay a minimal user fee for the course. I think this will make it so they will value the community, the resources and the certificate that results. Sorry it has to be this way but I guess I have to learn the hard way.

All those who pay the $9.99 will get my Teach | Learn coursebook when they graduate + a great certificate of completion. Also, 3 months of access to the resources (and to complete the course). The course will also serve as a pre requisite to the 120 hour accredited certificate I’ll offer in Jan. 2012.

Those who’ve already signed up for the class will get it free. I hope they slow down and savor the lessons! All those presently doing the course will have a month to graduate. Good luck! I also think this course would be a great “primer” for any teacher training program and hope trainers out there might encourage their students to take it. Even plan a course around it.

I do hope all teachers understand and realize the truth of what I’m saying, where I’m coming from. I thank you all for your support and again, not accusing any one teacher at all.

David

The 8 sided reaLITY of media

Print media, books/magazines/newspapers, have ruled the roost for over 500 years.  For good reason.  However, the time has come when Gutenberg must move over and new forms of media are beginning to take over and do things that only print used to.

I must admit, before going any further, I’m torn. I’m a bibliophile and in love with the texture of a book. I love getting up in the morning and thinking happily like Hegel, “how happy it is to greet the newspaper and see what’s new in the world”.  So I’m ripped apart by the conclusion that in all areas where it matters, the book is lagging.

I say this amid record book sales and an on the face of it, publishing renaissance. I have to say, I think this is a last gasp, a nostalgic last gasp at the straw of human imagination and desire.

First to look at these two things, we should start with some simple definition. 

Print media: no electricity needed to access/read (unless you count having to turn on the light)

Electronic media: all forms of media that you plug in to some source of electricity. If you are in the middle of the Kalahari – your Mac is a rotten apple.

Let’s judge the book and electronic media by some objective criteria.  Let’s see which is winning.

1. (Re)Producibility

Media should both be easily producible (first artifact) and easily reproducible (subsequent artifacts).  On both counts, we can say that electronic media  is much stronger in this area, especially in terms of reproduction. Both entail large investments in terms of effort and expertise, in production. But reproducibility is won by electronic media that can be copied ad infinitum with a click of a mouse. However, one caveat. Although we assume to think that the production costs are higher for print media, when we look at the environmental costs, recent studies have shown print media (contrary to popular conception) to have a lower ecological footprint.

2. Nobility

Media should have an “it” factor. People want it, love it, identify with it. I call this popularity – nobility.  We want to use what is popular, fashionable, in vogue. Our choices of media are often decided by nobility.  I have to give a slight edge to electronic media – how the ipad, ereaders, are indeed seen as “it”.  There is still room for the book to make a comeback here….

3. Portability

Media must be portable. You can travel with it, take it with you and drop it or get caught in the rain with it. The book still rules here. Electronic media is making inroads but we still await an implant that will give us instant access through thought – to information.  I’ve pulled a few books out of the bath and they’ve survived. I can’t say the same about my old kindle or memory sticks.

4. Sharability

Media must be sharable. It is this which breathes life into it.  I have to call this 50/50. Books are sharable because they are so “objectified” and “there”.  It is still hard for us to think of sharing something that is so abstract as electronic media. But it is making inroads – our minds are malleable and changing. The whole paradigm is changing.

5. Penetrability

Media should be something that makes it easy for us to “enter”, enter into the information and let it wrestle with our consciousness.  Traditional print media has a big head start with this, we are all trained to concentrate and “endure the tyranny of the voice of the book”. Electronic media leads us to  a short attention span, it lacks a capacity to grab us. We’ll stick with a book for hours in bed or on a  flight – not so with electronic media. I give books a small advantage here….

6. Durability

How long will the media last? What of generations to come, will they be able in a thousand years, kick start a Kindle and know what is there? What about books, how long will they last?    The major problem here is not just physical durability but also how the media may be accessed in years to come. Will people still read? Will the odt format be able to be decoded?   Books will last 700-800 years. They have no barriers to access over time (so far).   Thus, they do have more durability than electronics. This is an important consideration, we haven’t thought enough about….

7. Alterability

Media should be both sharable and alterable. Can it be remixed, reinterpreted. Not just reproduced but reproduced in a differening form. Can the media enable creativity and the organic growth of the information it contains?  Electronic media would seem to be vastly superior here. Instantly, alter, change, resequence. It’s easy, its transforming and society wins through this more adaptable media type.

8. Profitability

Media should offer the motivation of money. Without this, it is easy to see how information would not be so widely distributed and available.  On the face of it, print would seem to win but I must give the nod to electronic media. Any media that can so easily be reproduced and shared must after significant disruption, lead to a very profitable market and end game.

So there you have it, let’s  add up the numbers.

Print media:  Portability, Penetrability, Durability

Electronic  Media: (Re)Producibility, Nobility, Alterability, Profitability

TIE:  Sharability

So I have to give the present and future to electronic media. Move over Gutenberg, hello Karl Braun!

Dancing to the pied “textbook” piper

I spent a few hours looking at the conference offerings this coming fall. Something I’m used to doing and invigorated by – I’m energized by the pursuit of knowledge and no better place than a conference, a meeting of minds. Yet, this usually vitalizing activity got me very depressed.

Why?

Well, it seems there is within the “leadership” (if I may use that word and ruse), there is within this speakerhood of conference presenters, a very bitter hypocrisy.  I mean, so many are professing to be on the boat of humanistic teaching, of student centeredness, of being cutting edge and knowing of where the world of language teaching is going. And all this may be true. However, almost all are parading to the tune of the pied “textbook”  piper.

Let’s face it – the era of the textbook as we know it is dead. Yet, so many of these astute presenters are a generation born, bred and still getting their sustenance from the textbook absurdities of  12 units – speak, pronounce, vocab, read and write and you know English.  It’s all packaged differently, it’s all wrapped in a million layers of “newness”,  they’ll all swear their book is different but at the end of the day they are selling yesterday.  What’s worse – I find nobody calling them on it.

So next time you are at a conference with some veritable “name” on the stage. First, ask yourself if what they did (the textbooking they put their name upon) really has benefited students and led to learning and not dependence, to profit. Then, ask  yourself if what they are saying isn’t a bit hypocritical, given their publishing record. Finally, stand up and ask them this question – “if you could do it all over again, not needing money or fame and having a steady income from your inheritance, would you still dance to the tune of the pied  ”textbook”  piper?

The 4 Freedoms – Richard Stallman

I’ve written quite a bit here about copyright and control of knowledge through larger entities. One place to start is my “Captive Mind” series.  My attempt to publish my own previously published work and to stop institutions from having for perpetuity, control over knowledge.

Finally, some good news on this front. Princeton University has brought down a ruling that forbids their professors to give away copyright of their research to publishers. HORRAH! They are stopping to feed these beasts that cage away knowledge for big money. This is just a sliver of the door opening but it is a start. A start at keeping knowledge accessible and more open.  Academic journals, with their monopoly over published academic work, have created a huge wall around information – valuable information. I call it “the captive mind” and we should encourage all professors to demand to keep control over their work and to be able to freely publish and share on the web.

Richard Stallman is one of my heroes. He’s not the most likeable guy but he’s really been a warrior on the issue of free use and copyright.  His 4 freedoms apply not just to software (his field, he’s the guy who created GNU and transformed operating systems with an alternative to the proprietary force that is Microsoft). They apply to all forms of knowledge and the way we can be “free” to share and adapt it.

Here, I’ve adapted his 4 freedoms for forms of knowledge: essays, research and print/video lectures.

1. The freedom to read the work or watch that work, for any purpose (freedom 0).
2. The freedom to see and study how the knowledge was assembled, and change it’s form so it becomes what
you “know”. (freedom 1). Access to the work is a precondition for this.
3. The freedom to share so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).
4. The freedom to distribute copies of your modified works to others (freedom 3). By doing this you can
give the whole community a chance to benefit from your changes. Access to the original work is a
precondition for this.

Here he is at his best. He talks about how the freedoms apply to knowledge. A very valuable use of anyone’s time, to listen to his story and ideas….

A Student’s Death. Who’s guilty?


This week has been filled with violence in our schools in this part of the world. But really, just business as usual, only a little more press than usual. The case of Mitchell is one sad story of many.

As an educator, I’ve been following the whole issue of bullying/cyberbullying for quite a few years. I’ve always felt that even though schools and governments are spending a lot of resources and energy to “do something”, they are missing the mark, by far. The evidence that this behavior, so tragic, too often, continues, is evidence that schools are failing. I’d even go so far that they do share in the blame for the deaths of many students.

Yes, hard language, hard rhetoric. But I feel strongly about this. We are doing enough but we aren’t doing the right things. We got to change that. What should we do “right” and change, perhaps saving lives?

Danah Boyd, someone who studies teens and whose work I admire, so strongly and adroitly declares,

For most teenagers, the language of bullying does not resonate. When teachers come in and give anti-bullying messages, it has little effect on most teens. Why? Because most teens are not willing to recognize themselves as a victim or as an aggressor. To do so would require them to recognize themselves as disempowered or abusive. They aren’t willing to go there. And when they are, they need support immediately. Yet, few teens have the support structures necessary to make their lives better. Rodemeyer is a case in point. Few schools have the resources to provide youth with the necessary psychological counseling to work through these issues. But if we want to help youth who are bullied, we need there to be infrastructure to help young people when they are willing to recognize themselves as victimized.

Read her article in full. Something everyone working/concerned with our youth, should read.

She outlines more things we could do better. They include getting students to take control of doing something about this and stopping the adult moralizing. Providing places for victims to turn to, without consequences.

I say we need to go further, do much more. We need to use schools as crisis centers for the violence of the wider society. It IS that bad. Many say our society isn’t violent. I beg to differ. We don’t see it because so much is “sanctioned” and “okay”. From UFC bloodfests, reality TV shame shows, army games both real and virtual and I could go on and on…. I accuse – bullying is only a smaller version of our wider society and that it is so prevalent, is an indictment.

Let’s keep changing things through small steps in our schools and think more about how our schools fail because we as a society are failing.

Letter to Self

I just got home after an absolutely stunning fall day with my preservice teachers class – Education and Schooling.

This year, I’m again using an old trick I learned from the amazing Benjamin Zander. I’m getting them to write letters to themselves. They write a letter to themselves, saying why they got an A in the class. They write about who they will be after a year in class. I give them an envelope and stamp and then collect the letters which I’ll post in May, at the end of Teacher’s College.

I’ll let Benjamin Zander explain fully (like only he can) in this video excerpt.


Find more videos like this on EFL CLASSROOM 2.0

I am doing this for many reasons and not just for the surprise and joy of getting a “real” letter! I think it will foster and nurture a level of reflection but also, it will help tamper down the competitive demons that seem to plague both teaching and especially “becoming a teacher”.

The students seal their letters and I won’t be reading them. This is for themselves only and they are the only ones to be surprised or disappointed by the letter they’ll receive. We get what we put in ….

I’m writing this blog post because I also, in the vein of being a teacher that “participates” with students and practices his own constructivist principles, wrote a letter. I wasn’t intending to share it on this blog. However, I left my folder with lesson notes/plan and the letter at home. I couldn’t read it to my students. So alas,this compromise. Find the letter to myself below, for student reading but might be of interest to any and all teachers. Please forgive the length!

May 02, 2012

Dear class,

I deserved my A because I gave it my best shot.

What I mean is that given whatever our circumstances as teachers, we really have that as our yardstick and measure. I don’t agree a lot with the current mantra of “weed out the bad teachers”. There are no good or bad teachers – we are all adrift in the wind of our own circumstances and the only heights, the only bar we need climb over is that – we did our best.

This year I challenged myself in several ways and that’s why I got an A.

One. I asked my students to be responsible for their own learning and to be their own engine and light. I challenged them with the task of taking the curriculum provided and learning it of their own volition, curiosity and need. It was tough at the beginning but with time, students saw the classroom as a place of inquiry and thought, where their battle was only with themselves. And they grew more responsible and receptive of that freedom I gave them.

I deserved my A for avoiding teaching by numbers and allowing teachers to grow into their own teaching skins, boots, beliefs.

I got an A because I came prepared to my classes. Sometimes less, sometimes more – but that’s life. My best was done.

I got an A because I think I modeled a type of teacher we might want in our schools and profession. One constantly engaged in professional development, transparent and sharing ideas and resources. There is no finish line.

I deserved my A because I learned from my students and didn’t just teach them. When one teaches, two learn.

Lastly, I got an A because despite the dark, wretched winters here, I kept seeing the cup half full. Kept the class thinking and positive. Kept engaged and engaging knowledge. Kept being happy to come to class and have a place to be a teacher. It was never a chore but an honor.

It’s been a great year. I’ve developed so much. Like a tree, I have one more circle added and that will forever embrace and mark me.

Sincerely,

Your teacher, David

If you liked this post, you may enjoy, “Reflective Now, Reflective Then”

Free TEFL Course

I’ve long had the idea that there should be a very basic, low cost, online course for TESOL. For teachers around the world who need to think again about their teaching or especially for new teachers heading abroad without much idea of how to teach English.

So I did it. Here’s the introduction to the FREE course. 15 modules/videos with a quiz for each and readings. Finish the quiz with 80% and you can proceed to the next module. Finish everything and immediately get a certificate!

If you don’t want to enroll right away but want to check it out. Use ID/PW demo / demodemo or trial / trial1 and proceed as a teacher taking the course. [This course is now also available on Udemy]

Enjoy. Comments very much needed and welcomed. This is all in preparation for the launching of my own fully accredited online course in 2012 through my online school – School of TEFL. See this presentation for more info. Other teachers are welcome to join me and also teach courses there!

Posted in Prof. Development | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments |

The #1 …. (thing teachers are scared of)

Number One** Not your ordinary, endless list – just what’s number 1.

Silence

I remember being a new teacher and I was so deathly scared of any silence in the classroom! I’d yammer and stammer away just to fill that void. It was a panic attack, it was a nightmare, it was worse than death.

Now, with time, experience and a lot of training, I’ve come to see the value of silence. Come to see silence more as a friend/partner than a Freddie Kruger. I see how silence is not “nothing” but something very key and elemental to the learning process. Something necessary and valuable. A teacher’s best ally.

Silence is definitely an indication of student learning and not as supposed by so many panicking, sweaty palmed teachers – a white flag of nobody home and they’ve all surrendered. Especially with language, wait time by the teacher fosters learning and gives students whose brains are overloaded and processing so much with so little power (access to LAD and all that), a chance to digest and turn on the ability to communicate. Actually, silence is essential to all speech, to all communication!

When I think of all the truly great teachers I’ve met in the classroom, either as a trainer or as a student – I got to say, they all had tamed their fear of silence. They’d wait. They get great learning and understanding from their students. They’d truly come to appreciate thought over noise.

But it is so difficult, to shut up and be silent! I still have trouble and what prompts this post was a recent class where I found myself posing great questions but not waiting long enough as the students thought. Finally realizing how frightened I was by the silence and forcing myself to count a full and slow 5 seconds before continuing.

Train yourself, force yourself to be quiet. Count to 5 or even 10. I guarantee you, your classroom will become a place of greater learning. Thought entails and needs silence. It truly does. So let’s not be afraid of it!

The #1 … (delivery error teachers make)

Number One** Not your ordinary, endless list – just what’s number 1.

Assuming The Students Understand

“The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”

~George Bernard Shaw

I’ve thought a lot about this and based on my own experiences as a teacher in the trenches, based upon my own development and reflection, based upon knowledge of how a brain works and students learn – I’m convinced too many teachers don’t check student understanding enough. Especially language teachers. They assume there is communication with students when indeed, many times, they didn’t understand a thing.

I’m sure it is a familiar scene for all teachers. The teacher talking, explaining an activity or idea. The students nodding. The teacher continuing and assuming everyone understands. Do they?

The pragmatic elements seem to dominate. The students using context and non verbal communication “assume” to understand. Also, students just never want to say they don’t know. They are human. Teachers do the same. They see the polite nod and eye contact, the paralanguage of students and assume they are listening, they understand, there is communication. But really is there? Too often, I believe there isn’t.

As a language learner, I’ve had so many conversations or been in so many situations where this is the case. Teacher assumes she/he is communicating. The students not understanding and just “playing the game”. There is learning failure.

I think teachers need to do several things to avoid this kind of surreal and ineffective situation.

1. Filter the teacher language. This is a teacher acquired skill that often must be done by thinking through the lesson, the language of the lesson.

2. Pausing. Give Ss time to process language. 2nd language learners have brains that are hot and overworked – they need time to process the information.

3. Rephrasing. Get Ss to rephrase and communicate for the class what was said, explained. Students will put the language into a form better for student understanding. The teacher will know the students did understand.

4. Slowing down. All of the above entail that many teachers need to slow down in their lessons. Of course, this entails not pushing through units, coursebooks and you’ll have to negotiate this with your school. It does no one any good to finish a unit, if so little was understood!

24 hour giveaway: Zen and the Act of Teaching ebook

I’ve been pleased as punch by the feedback for this reflective journal. It will be mentioned and highlighted in several publications this fall as well as the hard cover book being used in several training programs.

Here is the ebook for your own review. The giveaway is over but please consider becoming an EFL Classroom supporter to get this book and many more books and resources.

Those becoming an EFL Classroom supporter through a lifetime donation get this book and many more (like the Teach | Learn techbook) as part of their paid access. Please consider supporting our community!

The main reason for P.D.

This morning spent some time reading and thinking about professional development for teachers. It’s an important issue – especially these days with the public demanding we root out “bad” teachers and set up systems of evaluating teachers.

Most good educational systems ask teachers to (even demand by law) engage in some form of professional development. This can take many forms but is usually formal and involves conferences, additional qualification courses, workshops, online engagement (twitter, blogs, collaboration), staff meetings etc…. Constant through all this is some level of reflection on practice.

I think all of this is great but we also should ask ourselves the rationale for this. Why do we do these things as teachers? The most obvious answer I hear is that it increases our skills as teachers. And I guess that is a good thing but I really think there is a deeper and more important purpose to formal or informal (just thinking about your classes, self learning, talking to peers/friends) PD.

I think we MUST engage in professional development because it allows us to see the value of ourselves.

Learning is such an invisible and slow act. We don’t see the results of our hard work instantly like a carpenter, a sales clerk, a plumber. There is no immediate effect to our “cause”. It can be disheartening to work day in and day out and feel you aren’t getting anywhere, not see any tangible returns. When a plumber fixes the toilet, they see the immediate result that it now flushes well and a family will be able to safely “do their number 2″. When a teacher teaches the reasons behind the second world war – it is almost impossible to see if students “got it” nor if it will have any effect on their “being” and actions as a human being. It is an invisible art we are engaged in, for the most part. We can’t see our work’s value (beyond a pay check and other tangible perks).

We need a way to keep intouch with our work’s true value. I think professional development can do that.

PD brings us into a wider community. It keeps us in touch with our worth, keeps us knowing we are worthy and making a difference in a very big way. It teaches that our “slow” is also “so powerful” and important to society.

So I want teachers undertaking PD to think of this some time. See PD not just as skill development but as a way of celebrating and understanding our larger value to our world tomorrow.

Using Songs in the EFL Classroom

This presentation has always been a fav. of teachers. Here, I add a voiceover and summarizing some of the main points (ever so quickly). Click on the presention to listen and use the slideshow underneath to go to resources highlighting each point (by clicking on the photos). Additionally, the “song” tag gives post gives with more information about using song in our classrooms.

If you liked this post, you might like – Songs With Lyric Sheets

Extensive Watching

The last few years, I’ve been very focused on the role and possibility of video in the classroom. Thus, my recent work developing EnglishCentral and my focus on the potential of a “Flipped Classroom“.

I had an interesting skype discussion with Dan Soriano (@danhummsoriano ) at the BC in Mexico City. He’s thinking of adopting a Flipped Classroom model as an experiment. During our discussion I returned to a term I’ve used over the years, “Extensive Watching“. I’d like to outline this important concept for language learning here and get your own feedback, opinion, thoughts.

I’m a big fan of extensive reading. It works. If done properly, it allows students to acquire a lot of fluency quickly (so long as equal attention is paid to speaking). However, the rub these days is that many students don’t want to nor like reading. It’s just a fact that I’ve run across time and time again in the classroom. I think it has to do with;

a) Visuality being an ever present force and medium now – through the internet, TV, film etc…

b) Communication. Youth are so connected, never alone and a book entails the place and discipline to be alone with self. Today’s youth want shared experience, a social experience. A book is in their head, the images in their head – something is never shared. A film / video has an objective visual reference and is more shared/social.

As I’ve outlined before, the Gutenburg Galaxy is waining. The role of text is taking a back up role to the cool medium that is the visual realm. This entails a change on the part of teachers. We should now update Day and Bamford’s classic and call it “Extensive Watching“. I took down the book from my self and revisited it. It can simply be re-written for this new media focus.

Students “watch” at their own level and through this massive watching of video with language in context, can, do, will achieve rapid language acquisition. That’s where EnglishCentral is coming from but it could be any source of video that is at the appropriate level for the student and contains motivating, interesting content.

I looked at pages 7-8 of the book, “The Characteristics of Extensive Reading”. I hereby end and hand the torch to Extensive Watching by rewriting this to outline the characteristics of extensive watching (and in a future post, I’ll outline the differences, however obvious, with the “extensive listening” approach).

The Characteristics of Extensive Watching

1. Students WATCH as much as possible. (preferably outside of the classroom – following the flipped model of the language classroom)

2. A variety of videos/film is available in a variety of genres and topics so as to encourage watching for different reasons and in different ways.

3. Students select what they want to watch and have the freedom to stop watching when the video fails to interest them.

4. The purposes of watching are related to pleasure, information and general understanding. The purposes are determined by the nature of the videos and the interests of the students.

5. Watching is its own reward. There are few exercises after watching and only for quickly reinforcing the material.

6. The videos are well within the linguistic competence (level) of the student. Video gives context and allows for a “wider” leveling. Dictionaries are used after the viewing and rarely during the watching of the video. Subtitles in the L2 may or may not be used depending on the objectives of the learning.

7. Watching is both shared and individual. Videos if possible, to be discussed and used as scaffolding material into purposeful communication and speaking practice.

8. Watching speed is at the natural rate of the media’s speakers. Whole watching is the recommended practice rather than stopping and reviewing video.

9. Teacher’s orient students to the goals of the program (communicate the rationale), explain the methodology (how to) and track what students watch, and guide students to get the most out of the program.

10. The teacher is a role model and watcher. They participate and watch what students watch. The extensive watching classroom is a place of equality and a decreased power dynamic between teacher and learner.

To wit:  Extensive Watching works and fosters student self learning and monitoring. It also has the added benefit of having pragmatic features of language (body language, postures, gestures etc…) that help the learner immensely (think of how a baby “makes meaning out of sound”).

Reflections on “Being A Teacher”

I’m sitting in one of these chairs, in “god’s country”, lakes and rocks and trees, trees, lakes, rocks, rocks, rocks, lakes, trees, trees, no people.  Divine. My last few days before beginning a return to the classroom.

I’ve spent the evening, refreshed by the lapping of the lake and solitude of nature,  reading “Getting Schooled” by Garret Keizer, in this month’s Harper’s Magazine. If you have the time, you can read nothing better about education and what it is to be a teacher. He hits on so many points, things that got my own brain sparking in light of the fact I’ve been out of the physical classroom for a year and my own head is filled with preparations for my first days back with new teachers in waiting.

I’ve now been a teacher exactly 20 years. No breaks. Year in and year out – often summers too. The last year I’ve been without much of a regular paycheck but it wasn’t a break – I remained committed and engaged each and every day online and through my own efforts to help teachers use technology.  In light of this anniversary and catalyzed byKeizer’s own article – let me sum up the things I’ve learned. Most mentioned in his fine article that I couldn’t hold a candle to. This list will have to do.

 

1. Teaching is  about human beings  and relationships.

Despite technology. Despite all the “wires” connecting people, schools, classrooms – this will always be the case. We begin there. We end there.  The past year I’ve been so connected to teachers and students around the world. Hundreds. Yet a vital bloodline is missing and that is the face to face. The small things that happen in a classroom, amongst the classroom community. That’s why I’m returning.

If there is any one thing wrong with our educational system, it is that it doesn’t cultivate and focus on building  more towards creating relationships between students, between students and teachers and between teachers. Students are batted around like shuttlecocks. Teachers never have time to truly get to know their students (but are told this is what a good teacher must do???). Everyone in the educational system lives fractured, fragmented days that sweep by. Let’s think more about making it different. And this isn’t something technology will cure.

 

2. Teaching is  “deep” and qualitative.

The reality is like the saying, “Education is what remains when all else has been forgotten”.  It is as wise a saying encapsulating the core of teaching, as any I know. Teaching is ephemeral. It is an enculturating process and we would do well to respect that, nurture that. It is as I infer in point 1 – about relationships and character building and creating great citizens, decent people. Not about remembering facts or writing a dazzling essay or dunking a basketball. These are all just means towards this one end. Let’s keep teaching about nurturing this “deep” wellspring of life and we’ll respect more its limitations. Let’s get this higher purpose back into our schools and classes.

 

3. Teaching is a tough, thankless profession.

Yes, those are the hard facts. As Keizer points out, too often society just expects teachers to be underpaid, overworked. Not realizing this indeed translates into poorer schools. You can’t have the captain of your ship making little and unrewarded. No matter how you applaud his efforts and shake his hand – he’ll end up not caring and the rest of the crew will go  maurauding.

Teacher’s  days are deadening. They kill the best of teachers. Marking, wiping noses, smiling when you want to scream, finding lost items, running here and there, all to the sound and weight of a heavy key chain. Need I go on?

What we need is earnest action to remedy this fact. Teachers staying with the same class longer. Teachers teaching content less (less stuffing of straw) and being more “with” students. Teachers need more time for the preparation and rehearsal of the drama that is a classroom.

 

4.  There is a thread that weaves through all.

Despite appearances, the students remain the same.  We talk so often about “digital natives” and how students are so different, in so many ways. We are looking at appearances, the fancy new hat and not the arms, legs, body that is always there.

I’ve learned that the simple things remain. Literacy, numeracy, nurturing thinkig skills, equity and equal opportunity, watering happiness, engendering a love of learning and curiousity, priming the soul of a student so they will learn of their own accord. All the rest is not dross but we shouldn’t get carried away by all the new programs, acronyms and the next educational “reform”.

I look at my students today and they remain the same as 20 years ago. What I do will change but not fundamentally. Sure, I realize as does Keizer that because communication is so ever present, because our students never experience being alone, they in some ways are different. They eschew reading, they want more visuality and social learning. This I will give but I also know that for the most part, despite these fancy new hats, they remain the same skin and blood and bone.

 

5.  Teaching must end up empowering students.

Poverty, violence, nihilism, despair are the lot of so many students in our schools. They live in broken homes and are raised by broken spirits. How to break the cycle? A better world calls. We have a duty to empower students and inject into them the necessity of being agents of change. Teachers need this too, for that matter.  We have to break the cycle and students have to be ready, like Keizer ends his essay, “ to learn everything you can about Carthage.”

We need to create citizens that are prepared to take their own destiny into their own hands and not to act robotically and to the beat of the drum that doles out pay checks. Life is too short for us not to make it better. Teachers can make it better through “cultivating their own classroom garden” and growing students that find out the power of their selves.

I say this with reluctance, I hate moralizing. But sometimes as a teacher we must raise our voice and clear the air. Teaching is, no matter how we hold our hands over our mouths and deny it – a very moral act and profession.  We are models from which lives are sculpted.

……………………………

I’m shutting off this machine and going to enjoy this beautiful day, with my whole family here with me.  Again, as Keizer so well describes, even more beautifully for never directly saying it  – the days, the years pass by so fast. We need to celebrate our lives as teachers by being happy therein. Wherever, whenever.

Now on to the next 20 years!

Teach | Learn “techbook” updated

I’ve again updated the book. Lots of additional multi media links/materials. As well, added some extra printables (the back of the book is loaded with them.) Get it here.     You can also get the book AND all the other ebooks/resources by becoming an EFL Classroom 2.0 supporter!

 

I’ve really been so happy and overwhelmed by the response by teachers – becoming supporters. I know I’m giving good value for the donation but still overjoyed members are contributing to our community and we are now about 70% of the way to covering the year’s costs. 

 

 

 

View samples here – Preface: http://bit.ly/geMws5     Lessons: http://bit.ly/gylisE                                          Teacher’s Notes: http://bit.ly/dGSj16  Certificate of Achievement: http://bit.ly/hnznO4

Your purchase does several things.

1. It supports a self published author and the community/content of EFL Classroom 2.0.

2. It promotes the student created content learning method. Students creating the curriculum and learning much more organically.

3. It shows that text books can be edited and supported with multi media materials. They don’t have to be “jailed” objects. Your purchase allows you access to the Teach Learn wiki where you can download an editable copy of each lesson (plus a ppt of the whole book for more editing or display with a whiteboard or projector.)[give me a day or so to upload there]

This book has a CC Sharealike license. As long as you are using it for non commercial purposes – copy away and share!

Please review on your own site and blog if you can. That will help immensely. For good or bad!

 List of additional resources the textbook provides:

1. 100s of multi media links for extension activity and further practice

2.A Voicethread students can visit to practice the lesson’s target language.

3. Dozens of extra blackline masters to use with lessons or seperately

4. A certificate of completion for students

5. Complete teacher notes and instructions/ideas for each lesson

6. The book completely in power point – for whole class reference.

7. A wiki where there is each lesson in .doc format – you can download and edit / personalize!

 

The #1 …. (voicethread of all time)

Number One** Not your ordinary, endless list – just what’s number 1.

Dr. Quinn’s Love Line

I can’t tell you how many tears of laughter I’ve shared with students while using Dr. Quinn as an example of Voicethread. He’s incredible and even after 5+ years, still brillant and new as the sun is each day.

I’m really proud of being one of Voicethread’s first supporters. I saw immediately the revolutionary thing they were and cheered it on as such. Really proud too of my own Voicethreads that have acted as models for many EFL teachers. But alas, I could never, ever beat, nor could anyone Dr. Quinn. It is so real, so genuine. A gem.

See my own tutorials for using/making your own Voicethreads – HERE.